DNE was started by two determined friends with a better way to help customers take charge of their energy. Founded in 2009.
Vivid Vision is a powerful tool to attract top talent, align the team, stay focused, and keep everyone motivated even in the most challenging circumstances.
We provide energy solutions for industrial and commercial customers focused on helping them spend less, use less, and harm less with the energy they use.
Redefine utility savings and sustainability with an all-in-one partner.
Overview >
Procurement >
Efficiency >
Sustainability >
Unify your approach by bringing together your organization's connectivity, collaboration, mobility, and management so you can focus on growth, not complexity.
Boost your organization's agility and efficiency across productivity, security, data protection, and collaboration with leading platforms.
Everything you need to know to stay up to date on energy trends.
Access monthly updates on energy market activity, trends, and opportunities.
Stay informed with the latest updates from DNE.
Explore top questions about working with energy brokers.
Through MNT Investments LP, five First Nations have signed an equity option agreement allowing them to invest up to C$1 billion for a majority stake in a special-purpose entity that will own the proposed Phase 2 storage tank at the Kitimat export facility. This partnership with the Gitga’at First Nation, Gitxaała Nation, Haisla Nation, Kitselas First Nation, and Kitsumkalum represents one of the largest Indigenous equity opportunities in Canadian energy history.
Rather than traditional royalty payments or impact benefit agreements, this model offers direct equity ownership in critical infrastructure assets. The participating Nations would share in both capital appreciation and operational cash flows, fundamentally aligning incentives between the operator and communities.
LNG Canada (a joint venture led by Shell, alongside PETRONAS, PetroChina, Mitsubishi Corporation, and KOGAS) structured this opportunity around Phase 2 storage infrastructure, with a Final Investment Decision targeted by the end of 2026. With Phase 1 exports now operational, the timing creates a natural entry point for Indigenous capital and ownership.
This partnership is more than a single transaction. It’s a potential template for how energy infrastructure projects will be structured in jurisdictions with Indigenous rights frameworks. If successful, the model could be replicated across pipelines, renewable projects, petrochemical facilities, and power generation.
As Indigenous communities gain equity positions and operational experience, some may pursue Indigenous-led energy development. The Haisla Nation is already advancing Cedar LNG, a proposed Indigenous majority-owned floating LNG facility. Equity participation in LNG Canada’s Phase 2 accelerates the learning curve for this transition.
For energy executives, the message is clear: the economics of inclusion are becoming the economics of success. Projects that embed Indigenous communities as equity partners will increasingly outcompete those that don’t. They will secure permits faster, access diverse capital sources, reduce operational risk, and differentiate themselves in markets that value ethical supply chains.
Frequently Asked Questions
Traditional models involve royalty payments, impact benefit agreements, employment targets, or procurement preferences. This partnership offers direct equity ownership, meaning the five Nations share in capital appreciation and operational cash flows. They become owners, not just stakeholders, with aligned long-term economic interests.
The Nations will likely access multiple capital sources including land claim settlements, economic development funds, commercial borrowing, and potentially partnerships with Indigenous-focused investment vehicles. Federal or provincial loan guarantees may also support the capital raise.
LNG markets are cyclical and volatile. The Nations will be exposed to commodity price risk, demand fluctuations, and competitive dynamics. If LNG markets weaken during Phase 2 operations, financial returns could disappoint. Like any equity investment, there’s both upside potential and downside risk.
If successful, this structure could become a template for energy infrastructure across Canada and globally. However, adaptation will be required based on project economics, scale, and community context. A C$1 billion LNG storage tank differs significantly from a C$50 million renewable project, but core principles (shared ownership, aligned incentives, governance participation) can scale.
Projects with meaningful Indigenous partnership typically demonstrate faster regulatory approval. Government agencies have mandates to advance reconciliation, and projects with genuine partnership frameworks face less opposition and fewer legal challenges. This can reduce the multi-year delays common in major energy infrastructure.
The specific governance structure is still being negotiated. Critical questions include whether Nations will have board representation, operational oversight, veto rights on certain decisions, and how voting rights are proportioned among the five participants. The degree of control will signal the partnership’s authenticity.
The offer allows collective investment up to C$1 billion, but doesn’t require all five Nations to participate equally or at all. If one or more Nations withdraw, the investment could be redistributed among remaining participants, or LNG Canada could seek other financing sources. This flexibility reduces execution risk.
Benefits include reduced regulatory risk, faster permitting, operational continuity through community relationships, access to local labor and territorial knowledge, ESG differentiation for international buyers, and long-term social license. Indigenous co-investment functions as a form of political risk insurance.
